Gosh!

by **Sandra** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 09:41 pm

memories, after all in men it was so short it was unmeasurable

by **Catch-up** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 10:04 pm

Why am I not surprised that the study was done in the Netherlands?

by **unohoo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:14 pm

Laydeez are always blown away by mine...

by **xxmaxiexx** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:16 pm

wow unohoo what took you so long I expected you to respond to this thread quicker :lol:

by **unohoo** » Thu Jul 21, 2005 11:42 pm

xxmaxiexx wrote:wow unohoo what took you so long I expected you to respond to this thread quicker

I was at a funeral.

by **Alan** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 08:00 am

Ah!............

by **xxmaxiexx** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 08:04 am

unohoo wrote:
xxmaxiexx wrote:wow unohoo what took you so long I expected you to respond to this thread quicker

I was at a funeral.

Sorry to hear tha Unohoo I had no idea
sorry if that came across un senstive

by **alohura** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 08:30 am

Love the comment on the men. Such a short attention span to everything

by **unohoo** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:07 am

alohura wrote:Love the comment on the men. Such a short attention span to everything

Again, not true. Some men, Yes. Most men, perhaps. Men, no.

If I were to met 5 women I considered ugly, I wouldn't say "Women are ugly".

It's sweeping generalisation like that that cause upset (see the "Smoking in public" thread).

by **alohura** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:09 am

unohoo wrote:
alohura wrote:Love the comment on the men. Such a short attention span to everything

Again, not true. Some men, Yes. Most men, perhaps. Men, no.

If I were to met 5 women I considered ugly, I wouldn't say "Women are ugly".

It's sweeping generalisation like that that cause upset (see the "Smoking in public" thread).

Unfortunately you cannot see the sarcasm floating around in the air.

I am aware that not all men have short attention spans.

by **Rammie** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:13 am

unohoo wrote:
alohura wrote:Love the comment on the men. Such a short attention span to everything

Again, not true. Some men, Yes. Most men, perhaps. Men, no.

If I were to met 5 women I considered ugly, I wouldn't say "Women are ugly".

It's sweeping generalisation like that that cause upset (see the "Smoking in public" thread).

Sweeping generalistations like

In general, smokers show no consideration for non-smokers.

posted by your good self? :wink:

by **unohoo** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 11:38 am

In general, that is true. Go to any pub, restaurant, cinema, etc, etc. Even Bernard's shop, at events.
Ocassionally smokers are considerate. They are not inconsiderate, they don't think "I don't care", they just don't think.
If you consider it a sweeping generalisation, fine. I don't, just a statement from personal experience.

by **Dragonlady** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:27 pm

Ballsofsteel wrote:Gonna get lynched for this....

So if there Brains are "blown" and shut down by orgasms whats their excuse the rest of the time???......

You are correct.

Everyone, please say goodbye to Loz.

Bernard! I need that Assassins note paper....

:twisted:

by **Alan** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:45 pm

Ballsofsteel wrote:Gonna get lynched for this....

So if there Brains are "blown" and shut down by orgasms whats their excuse the rest of the time???......

*Bundles Loz into fast car and heads for safe house*

by **Dragonlady** » Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:45 pm

*shoots tires on absconding car with pin-point accuracy*

Gosh!

Who is online